Research Productivity at Sulu State University
An Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62596/y4175d62Keywords:
Research, Productivity, State, University, AssessmentAbstract
This study assessed the level of research productivity among faculty members of Sulu State University using a descriptive-correlational research design. A total of 100 teacher-respondents were selected through purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, weighted mean, standard deviation, Pearson correlation, t-test, and ANOVA. The study examined research productivity in terms of research output and quality, research support and resources, and research culture and engagement, along with respondents’ demographic profiles such as age, gender, civil status, length of service, and educational attainment. Findings showed that most respondents were 26–35 years old, predominantly female, mostly married, with five years of service and below, and holding master’s degrees. Overall, research productivity across all dimensions was rated as “Agree,” indicating a generally favorable perception. No significant differences were found among groups in their perceptions of research productivity. Correlation analysis revealed a strong positive relationship between research output and research support, while a weak correlation was found between research support and research culture. A non-significant relationship was also observed between research culture and research output. These results support the Theory of Organizational Support, suggesting that institutional support enhances research productivity. However, the weak relationships indicate limitations in the development of a strong research culture, consistent with Boyer’s Model of Scholarship. The study recommends strengthening research mentorship, colloquia, peer-review systems, and collaborative writing to further improve institutional research culture and productivity.
References
Albina, A. (2020). Challenges in research productivity among Filipino faculty members. (Publication details need verification).
Altbach, P. G. (2015). The past, present, and future of the research university. In International higher education. (Publication details need verification).
Amerol, B. I., Berry, E. B., Chavez, J. V., et al. (2025). Exploring the strategies of education leaders in managing under-achieving faculty. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(9), 3831. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i9.3831 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i9.3831
Ang, J. V., Berry, E. B., Chavez, J. V., et al. (2025). How academic leaders induce motivation and productivity among faculty through faculty development management. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(8), 3913. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.3913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.3913
Ang, J. V., Tonalete, A. L., Macabago, J. M., et al. (2025). Diffusing stress caused by work-related experiences among faculty members. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(7), 3497. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i7.3497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i7.3497
Barrientos, A. A. (2025). Harnessing science teaching strategies for the least-exposed learners in science real-life settings. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(12), 3232. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i12.3232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i12.3232
Barrientos, A. A., Amar, C. J. R., Montaño, D. E., et al. (2025). Navigating challenges, triumphs, and transformations of college of teacher education graduates assigned in geographically isolated and disadvantaged areas. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(8), 3890. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.3890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.3890
Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2015). Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2215–2222. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23329
Bucoy, R. K., Enumerabellon, K. M., Amilhamja, A. J., et al. (2024). Knowledge deficits and analysis on comprehension of teachers on their common legal rights as teachers. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9), 2559. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2559
Calderon, J. F., & Gonzales, E. C. (2018). Methods of research and thesis writing. Rex Book Store.
Castro, F. L. T., Ventura, B. L. O., Estajal, R. S., et al. (2024). Teachers handling multiple subject areas: Difficulties and adaptive attributes in the delivery of instructions. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9), 2520. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2520
Chavez, J. V. (2023). Assessing online academic integrity and humanized teaching in Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences, 19(1), 9–17.
Chavez, J., & Lamorinas, D. D. (2023). Reconfiguring assessment practices and strategies in online education during the pandemic. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 10(1), 160–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1094589
Chavez, J. V., Cuilan, J. T., Mannan, S. S., et al. (2024). Discourse analysis on the ethical dilemmas on the use of AI in academic settings from ICT, science, and language instructors. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(5), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.6765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.6765
Commission on Higher Education (CHED). (2016). Higher education research agenda and development priorities. CHED Philippines.
Cutillas, A. L. (2025). Generative AI as a catalyst for instruction in higher education: A study on relevance and effectiveness. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(4), 3185. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i4.3185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i4.3185
Cutillas, A. L., Orquia, C. J. B., Bacalso, F. D., et al. (2025). Building confidence and updated mindset of science and tech teachers through professional development training techniques in science-industry settings. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(6), 3460. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i6.3460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i6.3460
Dela Cruz, R., & Cruz, J. (2020). Faculty development and research capacity building in Philippine higher education institutions. (Publication details need verification).
Hadji-Ali, A. (2023). Faculty workload and research productivity in state universities. (Publication details need verification).
Montero, J. M. (2025). Stakeholders’ security and confidence mindset of accreditation and ISO in university quality enhancement. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(12), 4299. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i12.4299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i12.4299
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Shin, J. C., & Cummings, W. K. (2014). Multilevel analysis of academic productivity: The case of faculty research performance. Higher Education, 68(3), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9724-3
Supian, N. U. (2025). Assessing cognitive-based attitudes, evidence-based research practices, and engagement-oriented professional development among college English instructors in Sulu. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(5), 3705. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i5.3705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i5.3705
Vivero, P. M. (2025). Promoting productive academic conferences: Educators’ perceptions through the interpersonal alliance model. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(11), 4259. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i11.4259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i11.4259
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education and Academic Settings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
