Academic Compliance Culture and Its Implications on Genuine Learning Among Filipino Tertiary Students

Mohammad Shafiq Kiram

doi:10.62596/6hshk189

Authors

Mohammad Shafiq L. Kiram Department of Education, Zamboanga City Division, Zamboanga City Philippines 7000 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62596/6hshk189

Keywords:

academic compliance culture, genuine learning, Filipino students, higher education

Abstract

Academic compliance culture has become increasingly evident in higher education, where students often prioritize fulfilling academic requirements over engaging in meaningful learning. This study explored Filipino college students’ experiences and perceptions of academic compliance culture and the factors that shape it. Using a descriptive qualitative research design, data were collected from 22 college students enrolled in higher education institutions in Zamboanga City through semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The analysis generated ten themes: Compliance as a Survival Strategy, Performative Participation and Surface-Level Engagement, Grade-Oriented Rather than Learning-Oriented Mindset, Normalization of Academic Dishonesty, Instructor Authority as a Compliance Driver, Compliance Under Pressure, Low Perceived Relevance of Course Content, Mental Fatigue and Academic Burnout, Peer Influence and the Normalization of Academic Behaviors, and Overwhelmed by Academic Workload Demands. These themes revealed that academic compliance is influenced by institutional expectations, family and peer pressures, workload demands, instructor authority, and concerns about academic performance. Compliance was commonly viewed as a practical response to academic demands rather than an expression of genuine learning. The study underscores the tension between educational goals and students’ lived experiences. It highlights the need for learner-centered educational practices that foster intrinsic motivation, meaningful engagement, and authentic learning beyond grades, outputs, and performance indicators.

References

Ang, J. (2025). What students never learn in a grade-focused system. Education and Industry Review, 1, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.62596/Eir.Xa3t5h70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62596/eir.xa3t5h70

Barayuga, T. S. D. (2022). Education students’ experience of authentic learning: A hermeneutic-phenomenological study. Volume, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.56901/MZLJ3745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56901/YSAS7036

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036232078.n9

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). Is AI changing the rules of academic misconduct? An in-depth look at students' perceptions of AI-giarism. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03358

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.

Doyle, L., McCabe, C., Keogh, B., Brady, A., & McCann, M. (2020). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(5), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987119880234

Fernando, E. Q., Tolentino, J. C. G., Cruz, M. A. D., Salenga, J. L., Maniago, V. G. M., Grume, J. C., Pineda, E. M., De Leon, A. P., & Miranda, J. P. P. (2025). Profiles of AI dependency: A latent class analysis of Filipino students' academic competencies. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (ICEMT 2025) (pp. 299–302). https://doi.org/10.1145/3761843.3761871 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3761843.3761871

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

Gorromeo, E. M. (2025). Implementation of authentic assessment among Social Studies teachers in the private Catholic schools during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(1), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.01.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.01.23

Gubaton, M. C. T. (2024). Level of students’ motivation and engagement: Basis for an enhanced intervention to promote students’ learning. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 5(7).

Habagat, J. B. A., & Hermosa, J. P. (2024). Authentic assessment in flexible learning modality and the learning outcomes in Readings in Philippine History among first-year college students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(10), 3968–3989. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.10.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.10.15

Jose, A., & Escote, M. (2024). Technology-based instruction and motivated learning strategies as predictor of student engagement in Araling Panlipunan. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(4), 461–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13377421

Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768

Knesek, G. E. (2022, April 25). Why focusing on grades is a barrier to learning. Harvard Business Publishing Education. https://hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/why-focusing-on-grades-is-a-barrier-to-learning

Lamaro, G., Ndyomugyenyi, E. K., & Openjuru, G. L. (2025). Performing quality or chasing rankings? Rethinking compliance-driven quality assurance in universities through the TESCEA transformative approach. African Educational Research Journal, 13(4), 472–485.

Magulod, G. C., Jr. (2019). Learning styles, study habits and academic performance of Filipino university students in applied science courses: Implications for instruction. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.504

Martínez-Argüelles, M. J., Plana, D., Hintzmann, C., Batalla-Busquets, J. M., & Badia, M. M. (2022). Impact of using authentic online learning environments on students’ perceived employability. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9555–9576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10948-9

Miranda, J. P. P., Bansil, J. A., Fernando, E. Q., Gamboa, A. B., Hernandez, H. E., Cruz, M. A., Dianelo, R. F. B., Gonzales, D. D., & Penecilla, E. M. (2024). Prevalence, devices used, reasons for use, trust, barriers, and challenges in utilizing generative AI among tertiary students. In 2024 2nd International Conference on Technology Innovation and Its Applications (ICTIIA). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTIIA61827.2024.10761175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTIIA61827.2024.10761175

Nambisan, A. M., & Rana, S. (2024). Effect of students’ personal agency on academic compliance: An experimental study. IAFOR Journal of Education, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.12.3.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.12.3.06

Philippine Institute for Development Studies. (2023). The learning crisis in Philippine education: An overview. https://edcom2.gov.ph/media/2023/10/pidspn2317.pdf

Republic of the Philippines. (2012). Republic Act No. 10173: Data Privacy Act of 2012. https://privacy.gov.ph/data-privacy-act/

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Sheppard, E. (2024). The impacts of authentic learning on student outcomes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri–St. Louis). Institutional Repository at the University of Missouri–St. Louis. https://irl.umsl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2541&context=dissertation

Stein, S. J., Isaacs, G., & Andrews, T. (2004). Incorporating authentic learning experiences within a university course. Studies in Higher Education, 29(2), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000190813 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000190813

Villarroel, V., Melipillán, R., Santana, J., & Aguirre, D. (2024). How authentic are assessments in vocational education? An analysis from Chilean teachers, students, and examinations. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1308688. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1308688 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1308688

Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2024). A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education: Best practices for the development of 21st century skills, and policy considerations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 101425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101425

Wright, E., Taffe, S., Luxton, S., & Wragg, N. (2026). Embedding authentic learning: A case study in curriculum transformation. Education Sciences, 16(3), 392. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030392